By Mary French, Director of The Dictionary Project

The Dictionary Project is about giving people value in their
lives. We are helping children build their lives one word at a
time. The purpose of an organization is to help people have
lives. Giving people lives refers to many characteristics that
are the result of education, support, work, and relationships.

This year the Dictionary Project has confronted the
reality that hundreds of thousands of children in schools
are discouraged and prevented from using a paperback
dictionary because school administrators do not think
they are beneficial in this age of technology. It is a
disservice to the clubs that want to improve literacy in
their communities by providing dictionaries to the students
and letting them know what a civic organization does and
looks like. Presenting the dictionaries in the classroom
lets the students know that they are valued and supported
and that the club members want to see them succeed
by giving them an essential tool for a quality education.

We often hear that children don’t need dictionaries because
they are tech savvy and they won’t use a dictionary because
it is old fashioned. Nothing has been created to replace a
printed dictionary. Children who do not have a dictionary
will not understand the “world they live in. They will feel
confused and angry because they cannot comprehend their
surroundings and describe what they see. It is putting children at a disadvantage in the world when educators leave them in front of a screen eight hours each day. Children cannot learn how to approach and solve problems without using their five senses. They need to learn what their five senses are telling them and how to use this information to live a better life.

A dictionary is the fastest, easiest and most cost effective way to learn new words. lt teaches children sequential learning; there are steps to take to reach a goal. It is important to know the meaning of words and that most words have more than one meaning. Children are curious how our world works. To collaborate with people to solve problems they need to learn new words to contribute solutions to improve the world we live in.

Everyone comes from a different place and they see things from where they stand. This diversity of thinking enriches our country and expands our ability to create new tools and make the best possible use of our resources. It is disappointing that lead educators are not encouraging children to learn new words by using a printed dictionary to expand their frame of reference; this is the most beneficial way to grow and live. By not giving children a dictionary, they are deprived of fulfilling their potential by teaching themselves new words. Giving children a dictionary is giving them their lives, because their lives depend on their ability to express themselves with words. The thoughts of children are important and they need to know that they are innate gifts to be shared because they are unique.

Albert Einstein said, “If a cluttered desk is a sign of a cluttered mind, of what then is an empty desk a sign?” An electronic device cannot replace the activity and knowledge that a mind can develop by using it to solve a problem. If we do not teach children to approach a problem with words they will approach it with a weapon. If children do not have a dictionary they will not feel empowered by words. They will not have the words to defend themselves.

The idea for the Dictionary Project came from Annie Plummer. At the time she was looking for people to
expand her initiative by giving everyone a dictionary in 1995. A middle school student in Charleston, South Carolina shot and killed his classmate in front of the school. Everyone was shocked that this would happen in our community and we never wanted it to happen again. School leaders said that mentoring would help the teenagers in the school. I was handed a young man who was I5 years old who was in the sixth grade. He had recently been released from the Columbia detention center where he spent six months after being arrested for pointing a 357 magnum at a woman in an embroidery shop to rob her of
$20. I went with him to his home and met his mother who was illiterate and recently widowed. She supported her family by cleaning bathrooms at night in the mall across the highway. She walked to work in the dark every night. When I entered the cafeteria to meet Tyrone for our mentoring session, I saw him slapping girls who were talking to him, he hid in the bathroom when he saw me. I asked him several
times in our meetings to apologize to the woman he had assaulted. He refused to acknowledge that he did something wrong. I told the principal that I could not help him because he had not learned to respect women. He wasn’t avoiding me he was avoiding the humiliation of being illiterate.

When I saw a letter to the editor asking readers to expand the Dictionary Project in Savannah, Georgia, I jumped at the chance to put a dictionary into the hands of children where I live because I knew that it is the antidote for illiteracy. It has been for hundreds of years. Reading is still the only way out of poverty.